Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Obama vs Israel: reprinted from Sultan Knish blog

.
Barack Hussein Obama vs Israel (from Sultan Knish)


The manifold organs of the ObamaMedia are abuzz with outrage over what they are calling Israel's "insult" to the United States. But what was the nature of this awful and outrageous insult? Did Israeli officials pull off V.P. Biden's rug to show off his bald head underneath. Did they ask him why the suit of his pants is so shiny. Did they make him sit at the kiddie table?

More to the point did Israeli TV air calls for a Jihad against America, as Palestinian Arab TV did? Did Israel name a square after the murderer of an American photographer, as the Palestinian Authority did? Did an Israeli Anchorman do a skit in blackface during Obama's visit, as a Turkish anchorman did during Obama's visit to Turkey? Are Israeli religious institutions issuing Fatwahs against America, as Al Azhar University, which Obama visited and spoke at, has done? Are Israeli leaders funding terrorism against America, as the Saudi King, before whom Obama bowed, does?

No, none of those incidents were described as insults. Nothing that Muslim countries did to mock, humiliate and murder Americans were even noticed at all. None of them produced furious condemnations from the White House or two hours of Hillary Clinton screeching on the phone at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. So what did Israel do that was so awful, so horrible and terrible? It built houses. Yes, civilian houses. Not army bases or nuclear missiles or walls. Houses.

Israel approved a construction project to build housing for its own people, in its own capitol city, Jerusalem. Some of the housing will be built in the Shimon HaTzadik neighborhood, situated around the grave of Shimon the Righteous, a Jewish religious figure famed for rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem. A neighborhood where Jews have lived for over a century. As well as Ramat Shlomo, a thriving neighborhood with thousands of Jewish families living in it.

The Obama Administration's objections to Jews living in Jerusalem are purely racial and religious. If Israel were approving a construction project to build housing for Arab Muslim citizens of Israel, Biden, Hillary and their media troupe wouldn't be screeching about it to the high heavens. It is only because Jews are to live there, that they have a problem with it. Their objections therefore are purely based on race and religion-- and completely racist.

But this is hardly the first time that Muslims and their Western appeasers have tried to drive the Jews out of Jerusalem, or the Shimon HaTzaddik neighborhood in particular.

In 1876 the land was purchased by the Jewish community in order to build homes for poor Jews. In 1936, after the death of Sheikh Izz ad-Din al-Qassam (one of the inspirations for Hamas) and the Mufti of Jerusalem (who would go on to collaborate on the Holocaust with Adolf Hitler), Arab rioters drove the Jews out of the neighborhood with cries of Ibtach Al Yahood (kill the Jews). Over 500 Jews were murdered during this time. Many more fled their homes ahead of the enraged Islamic mobs.

The following was a sample of some of the Arab Muslim brutality toward the Jews at the time.

Alex Morrison, a British truck driver sympathetic to the Arab cause wrote, "They left behind them one of the worst sights I ever saw in my life... The naked bodies of the women exposed the evidence that the knives had been used in the most ghastly fashion." The bodies of children, apparently set alight with gasoline in a nursery, were still smoldering."


The Arab Muslim atrocities were successful not at intimidating the Jews, who slowly began to return, but at intimidating the British who enacted the White Paper, and closed the doors to Jewish immigration resulting in countless numbers of Jews dead during the Holocaust. A Holocaust which involved the participation of the same Mufti of Jerusalem who organized the riots. Which in turn had been partially funded by Nazi Germany.

In 1947 the Arab Muslim forces again came for the Jews. The Jewish residents of the Shimon HaTzadik neighborhood, accompanied by militia, fought them back with the few weapons they had. And then came the British colonial authorities and disarmed the Jews. And when the Arab forces came again, they had no weapons to fight with. And they fled.

The fall of the area cut off Hadassah Hospital from the rest of Jerusalem. A convoy of 79 doctors, nurses and patients to the hospital were massacred by Arab forces. They included a world renowned ophthalmologist, Chaim Yassky and his wife Fanny. Esther Fassman, the American director of social services at the hospital's Cancer Institute, carrying candy and magazines for her patients. And a man who had been riding along to reach his wife who had just given a birth. He never reached her.

The Jordanian Legion seized all of East Jerusalem, and drove out the remaining Jews living there. Synagogues were destroyed, others were turned into latrines. The tombstones from Jewish cemeteries were used as paving stones for the Arab Muslim occupation forces. The Shimon HaTzadik neighborhood though held the tragic distinction of being the first part of Jerusalem to have its Jewish population driven out.

The houses that the Jews had been driven out of were occupied by Arab Settlers in an East Jerusalem rendered empty of Jews. The great dream of the Mufti of Jerusalem, and every Islamic cleric and terrorist, who had urged the murder of Jews in order to build a pure Islamic Arab Palestine was fulfilled. The Shimon HaTzaddik neighborhood was seemingly no more. Only the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood remained. Half of the historic Jewish capital was Judenrein.

In 1967, Jerusalem was liberated and reunited once again. But the victorious Jewish army did not drive out the Arab squatters. Instead in 1972 it restored the land in the Shimon HaTzaddik neighborhood to the communal organizations which had owned it allowed them to remain on the condition that they paid rent. Those who refused, were evicted. Slowly Jews began to return to their old neighborhood again. A school opened and a normal semblance of life with it. However the US State Department and European government have continued fighting the Jewish presence in Jerusalem, demanding that it be restored to its former Judenrein status.

Over and over again, the diplomats have taken the side of the Arab squatters who stole the homes of the Jewish families living there, until Arab mobs and armies drove them out. Even when Jewish residents bought the land from those squatters, insuring the absolute legality of their ownership from any and every angle, their rights to live there have been denied. And those demanding an Apartheid Jerusalem, reserved for Arabs alone, have continued spewing lies and distorting the truth by claiming that Jews never lived in the Shimon HaTzaddik neighborhood. That the only reason Jews live there now is out of spite (this in a city where spiraling real estate prices and crowded conditions have made apartments incredibly difficult to find.) And finally that the only reason that a housing project that has been in the works for over a decade was approved-- was in order to insult Joseph Robinette Biden... and through him America.

And then there was the Ramat Shlomo construction project. Supposedly the straw that broke the "camel's" back. Ramat Shlomo is and has been a Jewish neighborhood for some time now. There are thousands of families living in it. The 1600 additional units are not being built on inhabited land. Nor was the land ever supposed to be turned over to the Palestinian Authority in any conceivable settlement. In fact during the previous round of negotiations, even the PA had conceded Ramat Shlomo.

Let me be very clear then. The building of houses for Jewish families in a neighborhood where Jews have lived for 134 years is not an insult. A housing project that has been in the works for over a decade was not a secret conspiracy to humiliate the idiot Vice President on his visit there. It is of course an insult, but not to America. Only to Islam.

American diplomats have not usually described Israeli policies they dislike as an "insult"-- that is a term much more commonly used by Muslims, who are obsessed with perceived slights to their honor. Complaints over an "insult" is a common feature of Honor-Shame societies. America is not an honor-shame society. However the White House is currently occupied by a man bred in an honor-shame society. It is Obama that feels "insulted" by Israel, both out of the sensitivity of his Muslim heritage and his own egotism, which regularly motivates him to humiliate Republicans, while triumphantly celebrating his own greatness.

It is natural enough for Barack Hussein Obama to rely on such cheap honor-shame gambits. They are what he grew up with. And it is natural enough for him to keenly feel the loss of face of Muslims. After all his father's family was Muslim. And Muslims are keenly "insulted" when they conquer territory and then cannot hold it. Whether that territory is in Jerusalem, Israel or Spain or India. They cannot stand to suffer the loss of face. And neither can Obama.

Had there been a Jewish or part-Jewish President in the White House, the media would be raising the question of whether he is showing favoritism toward Israel. A question that has been repeatedly raised regarding Joseph Lieberman. A question that was raised regarding Goldwater, who was a practicing Christian. But the media refuses to allow the question to be raised of whether Obama is favoring Muslims because of his own Muslim background and family ties. Instead the media brands any such questions as racist, and instead spearheads the administration's campaign against Israel.

So directed out of the White House, a media firestorm howls enraged at Israel for presuming to allow Jews to live in a neighborhood where they had lived for a 134 years. The outrage. The offense. Heads must roll for this. Panicked, Netanyahu has already rushed to appease Der Fuhrer, suspending all home development anywhere in Jerusalem. Netanyahu has already apologized for building homes for his own citizens in his own country, but that of course is not enough. It's never enough.

David Axelrod huffed, "This was an affront, it was an insult." Hillary Clinton, Suha Arafat's former kissyface partner, called Netanyahu to berate him. And then did it again in the round of interviews, proclaiming, "It was insulting. And-- it was insulting not just to the vice president, who-- certainly didn't deserve that-- But it was an insult to the United States." Biden added his own voice. So did a bevy of underlines. Israel's ambassador was summoned to be yelled at by the Deputy Secretary of State.

In his visit Biden had repeatedly insulted his Israeli hosts. First he brought along Chris Matthews who accused Israelis of disliking Obama because they're racists. He arrived an hour and a half late to a ceremonial dinner. In other words he acted like every bit of the predictable buffoon that he is. Which is also not surprising given his history of hostility to Israel going back decades.

But none of that really matters. The bottom line is that the Obama Administration has been wanting to pick a fight with Israel for some time now... while pretending to be the victims. Much like the way Germany faked a Polish attack as a pretext for invading Poland, Barack Hussein Obama needed a pretext for waging his own political Jihad against Israel. All the while whining about how badly the Israelis have insulted him.

If it hadn't been Shimon HaTzaddik or Ramat Shlomo, some other pretext would have been found. Sooner or later, some visiting dignitary would have been offended by Israelis going on with their lives. Resulting in just this kind of cynical tantrum designed to win over Muslims and further degrade Israel's abilities to defend itself. The entire incident staged in keeping with the Honor-Shame background of the man in the White House.

Meanwhile in Jerusalem, Jews were celebrating the rebuilding of the Hurva Synagogue. Built in the 1700's, the synagogue had been demolished twice by Arab Muslims. The second time in 1948 by the Jordanian Legion, in order to insure that Jews would never return to East Jerusalem. They were wrong then, as Obama is wrong now. The plans of Muslims to banish Jews from their historic capitol are both immoral and racist.

Meanwhile the PA's Jerusalem minister, Khatem Abd el-Kader, condemned the renovation of the Hurva Synagogue, warning Israel that it was "playing with fire" and urged Muslim Arabs to "protect" the Al Aqsa Mosque. Naturally of course the riots are of course already on the way. An echo of the riots that drove Jews out of Jerusalem in the 1930's. Then the rioters had shouted, "Itbach-al Yahud" and "Addowlah ma'anah". Kill the Jews, and The Government is With Us. Except the government they mean now is not the British colonial authorities, but the administration of Barack Hussein Obama.


(translation here)

5 comments:

Stop The Madness! said...

President Obama, nor his administration, is an enemy of Israel, or Jews.

Many, for their nefarious purposes, are casting him as such. That is unfortunate.

In order for him and his administration to be seen as "honest brokers" for peace, they can't present themselves as biased to one side or the other, regardless of their private feelings.

To do so, would be to derail the peace process long before it's allow to get off the ground.

Many in the United States saw Israel's announcement of new settlements in a contested area of its region, during the visit of the Vice President, as a clear signal that negotiations would be compromised at the outset, and possibly stalled, despite the clamor of those who believe that they could lay historical, or moral claim, to contested lands.

That action alone, during the visit of this nation's next-in-line leader, was seen as an "insult."

Israel could have waited, at the least, until Biden left, if, indeed, peace, or the pursuit of it, is Israel's aim, and it wished to have the U.S. as a partner in the process.

If Israel doesn't want the U.S. as a partner, nor it's future support, and will build settlements where it chooses, it should at least be honest and clear about it's intentions now.

We have a right to know Israel's intentions. It's intentions have ramifications for our country as well. Indeed, for the whole world.

We were attacked on 9-11, as Islamics were quick to remind us, because of this nation's "Middle East policies." And those policies included our support for, and recognition of, Israel as a sovereign state, and having a right to exist.

Sultan Knish is a fraud. Any blogger who moderates comments, excluding those that challenge his positions, and opinions, and including only those with which he agrees, and from like-minded people, is a fraud.

It is his right to do so, mind you, but he loses credibility as a blogger, when he wishes only to present his own biased views, and suppress those that show dissent, regardless of how respectfully they're submitted.

Further, a survey of his blog reveals him as a hatemonger, with President Obama and his administration clearly in his crosshairs.

Hate will destroy this world. And Knish's contribution to it, although small, adds to the conflagration that is now consuming it.

President Obama is not a "racist." That is patently absurd. And the Vice President is not an "idiot." And to say so, is demeaning.

President Obama's stated position, and efforts to discourage Iran's nuclear ambitions are proof enough of his support for Israel, and evidence that he knows what is at stake in the Middle East.

This president has many enemies at home and abroad. And that is sad. Threats against him and his family are up over 300%, an unprecedentedly level for any president, now living or having lived.

And Knish ends his diatribe with the following insult to the United States people, and it's government by saying:

"Kill the Jews, and The Government is With Us. Except the government they mean now is not the British colonial authorities, but the administration of Barack Hussein Obama."

What a venal, and hateful statement! And it is a lie.

This administration has done nothing to show that it is with Israel's enemies, or this nation's enemies.

Any action can be so construed, just as the Bible can be used to advance any cause, or substantiate whatever action that is in the hearts of evil doers.

We want peace. This administration wants peace. We will seek it, but we will not compromise it.

Miriam said...

Hi Stop,

I want to believe you. I would rather what you are saying than what I'm suspecting.

Many, for their nefarious purposes, are casting him as such. That is unfortunate.

I think you are right on that. Some blogs have whole posts about any petty thing Obama does.

In order for him and his administration to be seen as "honest brokers" for peace, they can't present themselves as biased to one side or the other, regardless of their private feelings.

But I think they are biased. Towards the Palestinians. Maybe that's not considered biased...

Israel could have waited, at the least, until Biden left, if,...

I'm sorry no.

There is nothing Israel can do to be seen as good in in the eyes of the world any way shape or form at the moment. I've given up on that one until Israel does teshuva and wholly returns to the Almighty.

They could offer 90% of Jerusalem, and still somehow it will be seen as their fault if something happens. Nothing doing.

We have a right to know Israel's intentions. It's intentions have ramifications for our country as well.

????

Israel is its own country. It does what it wants. Just like Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, USA, etc.

This constant pre-occupation with Israel and with 'peace in the middle east' to me seems suspicious. Why would any third party constantly give money and ammunition to both sides? Constantly. There must be something in it for them. That is my logical conclusion. They must somehow gain from this endless claim for peace but never quite reaching peace. If I was not in it, i'd be so done with the matter. I'd let them duke it out and finished.

Hate will destroy this world.

I certainly agree 100% that hate and hateful people are trying to destroy this world. Did you read my previous post on the matter? I am quite wary of those who only want to suppress others just so that they'll be on top. Not really upset about what they may view as injustice, but more out to be the top dog.

At times I do fear if republicans are like that.

As for Sultan Knish, I can't say anything. I did, long ago, post a comment indicating my suspicion as to whether he's racist or not. He posted it. But then again, my comment was very mild and not attacking.

My concern is that I don't think Palestinian leaders (the people are a different matter) want peace. I think peace is just a very valid looking excuse that many people have to hate the Jewish people. There have been Jewish massacres way before any Israel state. The only difference I think is that now there is a supposed "legitimate reason" to be unabashedly hateful, mean, etc towards the Jewish people.

Truthfully, I have a hard time distinguishing between the druzim, the Bedouins, and the Arab Muslims, but on a daily life people get along. You perhaps don't see all that because you're not here. Life is so intertwined. You think freezing construction is not adversly effecting the Palestinians? They're out of a job. Life is intertwined. Those who want to get along, get along.

Its all very sad. This whole situation, I think, is used as a chip for every gov's toy. Like a play thing.

Stop The Madness said...

"We have a right to know Israel's intentions. It's intentions have ramifications for our country as well.

????

Israel is its own country. It does what it wants. Just like Russia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, USA, etc."

Granted. But our fates are intertwined. We were attacked, as I stated, because of our support for Israel.

And we have fought one war on your doorsteps, and another not that far away.

At any point, Israel can denounce the "peace process," if it's not serving its best interest.

My question--why does it continue the process?

It's because I feel Israel wants us as a partner in the peace process. And if a partner, both sides must operate honestly, and mutually beneficially.

My point is this. Our ties with Israel places the United States at risk, too.

If Israel wishes to go it unilaterally, then, so be it. It should do what is in its best interest.

But because we're partners in the process, and have a shared risk in any decisions Israel makes, it needs to make its intentions clear.

I think that's fair for both sides.

Stop The Madness! said...

"This constant pre-occupation with Israel and with 'peace in the middle east' to me seems suspicious. Why would any third party constantly give money and ammunition to both sides? Constantly. There must be something in it for them."

I agree. It seems suspicious. And I can only offer a speculative view.

The United States has pledged its support for Israel. But there's another reality--the Middle East provides a significant amount of oil for Western powers.

Therefore, the preoccupation. A hostile middle east can interrupt that flow of oil. And on several occasions in the past, that flow was abruptly stopped, and oil became a weapon in the hands of the Saudis.

Money was given to the Palestinian Authority to provide a police force from within to quell radical elements, and provide a measure of security.

"The PA was authorized by the Oslo Accords (1993) and subsequent Palestinian agreements with Israel, and was established in 1994. As now constituted the PA includes a president, prime minister and cabinet, a legislative council, and security forces...."

Not having a real source of income, no oil, very little tourism, and no viable way to maintain its own people, the PA was sitting on a powder keg of discontent, and potential violence that could spill over, threaten Israel, and interrupt oil flow.

Aid for the PA and the Palestinians became a way to appease, and to keep a lid on the pressure cooker of discontent.

It was in everyone's best interest. And that's my take.

Miriam said...

Hi Stop,

I don't have much time, not sure if you know but there is only one week left before Passover.

Actually, I really don't know you at all. Are you Jewish? Are you a democrat?

At any rate, the things that you have said does not alleviate my fears and suspicions. It all sounds nice and I like nice, but on this topic, I must rely on my intellect and not on what I would like things to be.

Re: dissenting opinions on blogs

My blog is mostly about Jewish topics and Black related topics. I once had a commenter who would post all their Jesus stuff. I kindly asked him to stop it. I didn't allow this dissenting view. Do I now lose credibility as a blogger? I have seen many blogs where the comment section disintegrated into arguments because a dissenter does not want to start their own blog, but insist on smooching onto other's blogs with their opposing opinion.

Anyone can go to a different blog to get a different opinion. No one is obligated to accept dissenting views simply to be "credible" especially to the dissenters.

re: Israel is its own country.

Israel is its own country. It can do whatever it wants. End of story.

America is not obligated to broker any peace deal, no matter who's doing the asking. Countries don't work like that. I am not entirely sure that Israel asked for this. I don't know. But regardless, what? America now must comply until Israel says stop? Who's leading who? America can also do whatever it wants. To assume country x must do something simply because country y says so (especially if there is no monetary, military gain)is...i don't know.

But I agree that Israel's leaders ought to stop the farce of a peace attempt. I think the only people who think any peace is being attempted here is probably the American people fed by their media. I think even Israel's leaders know that neither Hamas nor Fatah want peace. But they need to stop playing around. (I wonder what they have to gain...maintaining political power maybe...)

re: Obama being racist

I don't know. I also find it amazing that you can say he isn't racist so boldly. Do you know him? At any rate, that's fine, but I will stick to my belief that I simply don't know.

Re: biased

Hamas has been launching katyusha rockets into Israel civilian area for years. Years. There has been no out cry by the media, US government, UN, etc. When Israel had enough they retaliated. Oh what an uproar! The world is wringing its hands, something has to be done! Sound the alarm.

I have heard with my own ears the sound of a bus full of people being blown up. The whole town of Tzfat had to evacuate due to an onslaught of rockets. Many families including my own had to accommodate 7 or 8 people for about a week. Not much outcry from the world.

Do you know what an outpost looks like? Those "settlements" that's preventing "peace"? Some of them are three ram shackle huts. That is preventing peace?! Really?

Have you been to Ramat Shlomo? The place where they decided to build when Biden was there? Its 100% Jewish- like Boro Park. Building there will not -nay, can not- in the physical world- damage anything the Palestinians want or need.

you said:
"Not having a real source of income, no oil, very little tourism, and no viable way to maintain its own people, the PA was sitting on a powder keg of discontent, and potential violence that could spill over, threaten Israel, and interrupt oil flow."

What? And they want their own country?!

I'm not out to convince you of anything. And I do reserve the right to be a "bad" blogger and delete your post. I admit I had a glimmer of hope that you'd convince me. No longer. I must use my intellect and believe what I see and hear with my own eyes and ears. I can not afford to dilute myself and I feel bad for the world that is not waking up to this problem. Nevertheless, Israel can't wait for everyone else to wake up.